Qualitative research designs are generally assessed in terms of their credibility , confirmability , dependability and transferability , amongst other factors. Conversely, when the amount of error is large , the reliability of the measurement is low. Actual level of intelligence Error: Take the following example:. In most cases, since you did not witness the way that the research in the main journal article was carried out in practice, it will be difficult to assess the objectivity of the research. Determine how you will overcome such weaknesses in your dissertation. Reliability, like validity , is a way of assessing the quality of the measurement procedure used to collect data in a dissertation.
This measurement procedure should provide an accurate representation of the construct it is measuring if it is to be considered valid. You can learn more about these types of reliability in the article: This is the case whether you are an undergraduate or master? Irrespective of the route that you are following, or the approach within that route, it is important that a your dissertation is as internally and externally validity as possible, b the measurement procedure you used i. Even if limitations in the research strategy do not act as the main justification for your choice of route , or the approach within that route i.
As such, we can say that the measurement procedure is not reliable. When you understand the five factors through which research quality is assess i.
Caused by factors including current mood, level of fatigue, general health, luck in guessing answers to questions you don’t know.
Actual reaction speed of person Error: Reliability in research Reliability, like validityis a way of assessing the quality of the measurement procedure used to collect data in a dissertation.
Irrespective of the route that you are following, or the approach within that route, it is important that a your dissertation is as internally and externally validity as possible, b the measurement procedure you used i. For example, multiple measurements can be taken instead of a single measurement, with the scores from the multiple measurements being averaged.
So what do we mean when we say that a measurement procedure is constant or stable? By comparison, where the error component within a measurement procedure is relatively largethe scores that are obtained over a number of reliabillity will be relatively inconsistent ; that is, there will be large differences in the scores between measurements. Since there are many ways of thinking about intelligence e.
After all, in STEP TWO below, you will need to assess the research quality of the main journal reliabikity, before being able to consider the potential weaknesses in research quality in your dissertation, and how you will overcome these weaknesses.
In addition, since many undergraduate and even master? Conclusionsand c the greater the likelihood of a high mark. When we think about the reliability of these variables, we dissertstion to know how stable dissertatioj constant they are. STEP TWO Assess the research quality of the main journal article Irrespective of the route that you are following, the person marking your work will expect that you have critically analysed the research strategy used in the main journal article.
Would expect measurements of IQ to be a few points up and down of your actual IQ, not to points, for example i. The error reflects conditions that result in the score that we are measuring not reflecting the true scorebut a variation on the actual score e.
Rwliability validity External validity Extraneous and confounding variables Construct validity: You can learn more about these types of reliability in the article: However, it is worth mentioning that: By construct validwe mean that there is a a clear link between the constructs you are interested in and the measures and interventions that are used to operationalize them i.
Quite simply, the better the research quality of your dissertation, a the fewer problems you will experience when carrying out your dissertation research, b the less time you will need to write up the Research Limitations section of your Conclusions chapter i.
For example, multiple measurements can be taken instead of a single measurement, with the scores from the multiple measurements being averaged.
Determine how you will overcome such weaknesses in your dissertation. Building the theoretical caseyou have to demonstrate an equally good knowledge of the weaknesses and strengths of the research strategy of disserttation main journal article. As such, we can say that the measurement procedure is reliable. Take multiple measurements rather than a single measurement, and then average the scores.
How to write a great Research Quality section | Lærd Dissertation
Assess the disertation quality of the main journal article. When we examine a construct in a study, we choose one of a number of possible ways to measure that construct [see the section on Constructs in quantitative researchif you are unsure what constructs are, or the difference between constructs and variables].
It is assumed that this happens randomly, with the error averaging zero over time; that is, the increases or decreases in error over a number of measurements even themselves out so that we end up with the true score e.
Reaction time by measuring the speed of pressing a button when a light bulb goes on i. All measurement procedures involve error. However, the research quality of quantitative research designs is determined in terms of their internal validityexternal validityconstruct validityreliability and objectivity. Research quality All research has limitationswhich negatively impact upon the quality relisbility the findings you arrive at from your data analysis.
Reaction time by measuring the speed of pressing a button when a light bulb goes on i. Potential for time to be significantly different from one measurement to the next e.